Solution LAB2 guanine 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Using ecutwfc=50 Ry and 35 au of cell size, | Using ecutwfc=50 Ry and 35 au of cell size, | ||
E_tot(N) = | E_tot(N) = -193.48101821 Ry | ||
E_tot(N-1) = -192.89782124 Ry | E_tot(N-1) = -192.89782124 Ry | ||
giving | giving | ||
IP = E_tot(N-1) - E_tot(N) | |||
= 0.58319697 Ry | |||
= 7.934861 eV | |||
now much closer to the experimental value of 8.0-8.3 eV. | |||
Interestingly, one can run the same set of calculations also using different functionals, | Interestingly, one can run the same set of calculations also using different functionals, |
Latest revision as of 10:36, 26 March 2021
- Back to the previous page: Electronic properties of isolated molecules#Exercise 3
For calculation of E(N-1) we need to set the following flags in the &SYSTEM namelist:
nspin=2 ! Note, now we have unpaired electrons: tot_charge=+1 ! charged system tot_magnetization=1 ! we need to set a total magnetisation
Also, the following option needs to be used for charged systems :
assume_isolated="mt"
Using ecutwfc=50 Ry and 35 au of cell size,
E_tot(N) = -193.48101821 Ry E_tot(N-1) = -192.89782124 Ry
giving
IP = E_tot(N-1) - E_tot(N) = 0.58319697 Ry = 7.934861 eV
now much closer to the experimental value of 8.0-8.3 eV.
Interestingly, one can run the same set of calculations also using different functionals, including GGAs (PBE), meta-GGAs (eg TPSS or SCAN), hybrids (PBE0), or HF itself.
In order to do this, you can force e.g. the functional from input, by using:
&SYSTEM [...] input_dft="PBE0" /
How do -eps_HOMO and delta-scf values compare ?