Difference between revisions of "Solution LAB2 guanine 3"

From Wiki Max
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "* Back to the previous page: Electronic properties of isolated molecules#Exercise3 When dealing with cation pay attention to tot_charge nspin tot_magnetization")
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
* Back to the previous page: [[Electronic properties of isolated molecules#Exercise3]]
+
* Back to the previous page: [[Electronic properties of isolated molecules#Exercise 3]]
  
When dealing with cation pay attention to  
+
For calculation of E(N-1) we need to set the following flags in the &SYSTEM namelist:
   tot_charge
+
 
   nspin
+
nspin=2              ! Note, now we have unpaired electrons:
   tot_magnetization
+
tot_charge=+1        ! charged system
 +
tot_magnetization=1   ! we need to set a total magnetisation
 +
 
 +
Also, the following option needs to be used for charged systems :
 +
assume_isolated="mt"
 +
 
 +
Using ecutwfc=50 Ry and 35 au of cell size,
 +
  E_tot(N)  = -193.48101821 Ry 
 +
  E_tot(N-1) = -192.89782124 Ry
 +
 
 +
giving
 +
  IP = E_tot(N-1) - E_tot(N)
 +
    = 0.58319697 Ry
 +
    = 7.934861 eV
 +
 
 +
now much closer to the experimental value of 8.0-8.3 eV.
 +
 
 +
Interestingly, one can run the same set of calculations also using different functionals,
 +
including GGAs (PBE), meta-GGAs (eg TPSS or SCAN), hybrids (PBE0), or HF itself.
 +
 
 +
In order to do this, you can force e.g. the functional from input, by using:
 +
 
 +
   &SYSTEM
 +
    [...]
 +
    input_dft="PBE0"
 +
   /
 +
 
 +
How do  -eps_HOMO and delta-scf values compare ?

Latest revision as of 12:36, 26 March 2021

For calculation of E(N-1) we need to set the following flags in the &SYSTEM namelist:

nspin=2               ! Note, now we have unpaired electrons:
tot_charge=+1         ! charged system
tot_magnetization=1   ! we need to set a total magnetisation

Also, the following option needs to be used for charged systems :

assume_isolated="mt"

Using ecutwfc=50 Ry and 35 au of cell size,

 E_tot(N)   = -193.48101821 Ry  
 E_tot(N-1) = -192.89782124 Ry

giving

 IP = E_tot(N-1) - E_tot(N)
    = 0.58319697 Ry
    = 7.934861 eV

now much closer to the experimental value of 8.0-8.3 eV.

Interestingly, one can run the same set of calculations also using different functionals, including GGAs (PBE), meta-GGAs (eg TPSS or SCAN), hybrids (PBE0), or HF itself.

In order to do this, you can force e.g. the functional from input, by using:

 &SYSTEM
   [...]
   input_dft="PBE0"
 /

How do -eps_HOMO and delta-scf values compare ?